YECHeadquarters.org - Articles and resources for believers in six day creation

YEC Headquarters: Your one stop six day creation site, where God's word rules!

How site got started

The owner: I used to debate for the creation subject on several forums on the Internet. And soon realized there was a need that was not being met. A need to teach other creationists on how to debate evolutionists. And also good information that can be used during a debate. The site was my first site. I learned everything about building a site while building this one. I also learned how to make custom graphics, and do flash animation, and flash non-animated.

Videos

Several Youtube and Godtube videos have been added to the site for better understanding of each subject discussed. Each video that is made by owner of site is custom made. Here are some examples:

Youtube

Godtube music videos

etc...

Note: Some videos are made by other youtube users.

Young Earth Creation Headquarters. Where the "literal" word of God is believed from beginning to end.

Where site is headed

Website page2.jpg

The owner: As I have become better in custom flash animations. My intentions are to use flash illustrations as much as possible. My flash animation skill currently only deals with 2d. I will soon learn 3d flash. Site is always changing because as I research more about creation. the more I learn and put the pieces together. As my knowledge and understanding of creation grows. My site changes and grows with it.

What makes the site unique?

The custom flash animations. Here are a few samples of flash animations from site.

etc...

How the site is set up

The site is set up like reading a book. Each page has a next link at the bottom to click on to continue with the subject. If the next button quits working, there is nothing more to read in that section. Text size is set up for easier reading so eye strain is at a minimum.

Webmaster choice pages

  1. About page: [1]
  2. Sinner's prayer:[2] Say a simple prayer and ask Christ into your heart.
  3. Creation in detail: [3]
  4. Evolution shame: [4] Shows where evolution has information that is wrong and refuses to correct it. Also shows some of the sordid past of evolution.
  5. Evolution shame part 2: [5] Shows evolutionists using religious bigotry to fire teachers, remove heads of schools, deny passing grades, deny recommendations in college for students, etc... All because of belief in God. And they even admit to it (have actual quotes).
  6. Evolution shame part 3: [6] Shows where evolutionists have started a movement of hate so extreme for anyone that believes in God. That they will even suggest killing Christians. Warning: This section reveals hate so extreme. That it is not recommended for Children.

More than 90% of all information is backed up by references.

Why do I expose the information above? Two reasons:

  1. Because I believe that all believers should know what is brewing on the Internet as far as what they believe is concerned.
  2. That Evolutionists have a chance to see where their theory is taking some people, and that those who do this put science to a disgrace. And it should not be allowed to continue.

Contact

Whois information is public, but in response to some people wanting to keep their contact information private, many domain name Registrars offer a "privacy" or "proxy" service to mask the domain name owner. This domain is most likely using a proxy service.

What's new?

The owner of website is currently working on a new creation theory. One that so far seems to answer all questions about creation, and can actually be back up by bible scripture. It's called Eternal Time Creation.

Brief explanation: Time before the first sin was not cursed with death. Which means: the first six days of creation were eternal or eternal time. So all that was created was created under the rules of how eternity works. Not how time, as we understand it, works today. So if eternity has no death, it would also mean that there is no aging process. Why? Aging only has one goal. And that goal is death. And aging also requires a starting point which for life means birth. And a time-line that connects the birth to death.

To sum it up: Non-eternal time has three things that make it non-eternal. 1) Birth (beginning) 2) time-line (appointed time to live) 3) Death (an end).

For eternity to work, these three things cannot be a part of the process. So time passes in eternity, but these three things are not a process of it. What this means is that if birth cannot take place in eternity time. Everything "has" to be created (how else does life come to be if birth is not a process of the time-line that existed?). And because aging is not a process of eternal time, everything created has to be created with age already added.

Example 1: If you were born in eternity, where aging does not happen. When would you grow up? Also, how would you grow in your mother's womb if aging does not happen? So birth just cannot happen in eternity, only creation.

Example 2: A 4.5 billion year old earth is created 6 thousand years ago so that life could exist upon it. If earth were new and hot when created, when would it cool down if aging is not a process? All the animals were created with age so that they could go forth and multiply. Adam And Eve were created with age so that they could go forth and multiply. So this applies to both living and non-living matter. It affects every-thing in that eternal time-line.

This explains why evidence for both young, and old earth can be found. One tells us what was created "with age" during those six days of eternal time (old earth). The other tells us what was "not created with age", and only aged along with the 6,000 year biblical time-line. So the difference between YEC (Young Earth Creation), and OEC (Old Earth Creation). Is that OEC is only looking at the evidence that was created with age during the eternal time creation. YEC only looks at what was not created with age during the eternal time creation. So in actuality OEC and YEC belief "only", has only 1/2 of the truth for creation. Adding eternal time creation combines the two, and makes 100% truth.

Does this conflict with age dating?

No. Anything buried in what was created with age already added, is cross contaminated by the aged matter that surrounds it. This is why the fossils date the layers, and the layers can date the fossils so well. The aged layers contaminated the age of the fossils to make them date the same age, which happens to be older than the fossils actually were. But the age of the layer is correct (because the earth was created to be 4.5 billion year "aged", on the day it was created). The age of the fossil was not. It just got buried in that layer during Noah's Flood.

This is how science can find both blood and tissue still intact on a supposed 70 million year old T-Rex. The layers that T-Rex fossils are found in, cross contaminated the fossils to date 70 million year old. An actual bone 70 million years old will be petrified. It will not have both blood and blood vessels. And to this day they have not found any other evidence to explain this find. So what conditions preserve blood and tissue for 70 million years? Nothing around that find could explain it, or they would have already done it. This is why things like a 325 million year old fish can be found alive, and un-evolved from it's fossils finding. That amount of time never actually passed. Which also explains how the claim that oil takes millions of years to form even happened. Did they duplicate these conditions found around where the oil is to make sure? Or did they just assume this because they also assume that the dinosaurs lived and died that long ago? Oil can be made in one day when the near exact conditions that exist in the area of where the oil was found are duplicated. Things were created with age that only make it seem that way because so many deny the power of God to create like this. And to explain this away, some will even go as far as to say that God is deceptive to create in such a fashion.

How about the Geologic Column?

I really don't have any problem with it as far as the column dating goes. But dating of the finds in each layer, when cross contamination does happen, is telling us that this is not a fail safe dating method. In fact to rule out all other possibilities, has science ever tested other theories on the geologic column? No. Why? The Geologic Column is one of the main foundations of most of the finds about the theory of evolution that science supports the most. Putting this one thing into question puts the whole theory into question because most of it's evidence is based on the geologic column and how it works. So put into question the actual time-line, the rest is put into question as well. This also puts into question the age of everything.

But the Eternal Time Creation theory also answers a lot of question on both sides that were not answerable before.

Mounting evidence against the age of the Dinosaurs?

When I was in high school, I can remember being taught about how long it took for Bio-mass, and dead dino mass to decay, and make oil. Millions of years it was. And even how long it takes for something to petrify, which was several 100,000 years. These two things alone were taught in school as "actual truth". Truth as if it had been tested. Truth because it supported the theory of old earth. Truth that would later turn out to be an assumption that science never tested (if tested when claimed, someone please show the evidence). Only because they wanted something out there that would make people question there was a God.

The oil taking one day to form, I talked about earlier. But here is where petrification also falls into place as not taking as much time as first thought.. Objects subjected to heavily mineralized water can become petrified in less than 6 months. Proving the process does not take as long as we were taught in school that it would. And certain conditions, not time, determine how fast something will petrify. A fine example is petrified wood. If the process takes 1000 of years, the wood would rot before it petrified. But yet we have a petrified forest?

Then we have the Ica stones. How do you get a carving on a stone of a dinosaur to match the pattern of two pieces of dinosaur skin, when the carvings were before these finds? The petrified dinosaur skin finds actually authenticated the drawings on the stones to be real. And that man actually saw the dinosaurs, that drew the originals, in order to draw them correctly. How else do you draw anything correctly unless you see it?

Then we have the human foot prints with dinosaur foot prints. The evidence that evolutionists have fought so hard to cover up, or destroy. Problem is, the original pictures still exist, and pictures don't lie. But I have examples of where evolutionist altered these pics to make them look fake so that their arguments about them being fake would be stronger.

Then we have the dinosaur blood and tissueI mentioned earlier.

Does coal take millions of years to form?

It has often been said, written in text books, and taught in our schools that coal takes millions of years to form. And that the main source was plant bio-mass. But, like the claims about oil formation, did science really test their claims about coal, or did they just make the claim? Here you can see where the coalification process of wood can be started in just two weeks. And in 8 months complete coalification of wood can take place. Also see man made objects still intact with the coal.

Even though coal has been proven to not take as long as first thought, there are still education sites claiming it still takes millions of year. Power Works, 4 Schools How coal is formed over 400 million years etc...

6 things that seem out of place. But when you apply eternal time creation, they fit right into place. Evidence does not have to be denied. Because each supports the view of what happened, and how things were created.

Human and chimp DNA difference

Evidence for creating things old even though 6,000 years have past:

Moon dust 2.JPG

The moon dust theory. Now I know a lot of people think this is debunked. But as you read the page I linked to about this, ask yourself these questions: If the moon dust thing was so easy to prove wrong. Why did science (NASA) do so many tests, and spend so much money to do it? And why was it that the results from each of those tests did not support the finding of any other? There was "thirteen tests" in all to try and prove what Petterson did was wrong (his results). Why did it take so many tests if this type of testing is supposed to be accurate?

Anyway, what eternal time creation does with this issue. Is that it allows for a 4 billion year old moon to exist (God creating with age already added). And also allows for 3 inches of dust to be upon the surface of the moon (support for 6,000 years of actual time passage). This supports that things have to be created in eternity, and have to be created with age already added because the aging process is not a part of the eternity time-line. Or it would not be eternal.

2) The decaying orbit of the moon. This is also denied by science because this does not fit into the time-line that has supposedly passed. Denial does not make evidence void. The moon's decaying orbit is a fact. And it's a fact that it does not line-up with how long it has been decaying according to it's age (as shown from the link above).

But if you take the eternal time creation. Put a 4 billion year old moon, to orbit the earth, 6,000 years ago. The moon's decaying orbit is not a problem. The age dating of the moon is not a problem. And again this shows how creation has to work in the eternal time creation. Everything is created with age upon the day of it's creation because "nothing" can be birthed into eternity or it would not be eternal. Eternity has no beginning because it also has no end.

Support for quick creation of things that date old:

3) The Polonium halos (towards bottom of page) are found in rock dating millions of years old. But yet the polonium (214, 218) itself only has a half life of less than 3 minutes when things are supposed to form "very slowly". So here you have both quick creation and old earth evidence mixed with no real explanation.

But when you apply the eternal time creation, where the rock was created with age already intact. Then the polonium halos are a measurement of actual time passage (how quick the rock was actually created). And is support for quick creation. So a rock with millions of years aged (age added upon being created) is created quick enough to capture polonium halos with a half life of less than 3 minutes.

Contact information

E-mail:

Related Domains



AboutUs Featured Wiki Page

FeaturedSiteBadge.gif
Featured on 4 June 2007

Featured Text -- We at AboutUs believe that one of the things that makes our Community great is having a wiki wherein people can provide their opinions and thoughts in a constructive manner in an attempt to enrich discourse, knowledge and diversity of opinion, not just at AboutUs but around the world. One such area of hotly contended debate is the question of evolutionism versus creationism. While opinions of AboutUs Staff and community members all differ on this subject, it's hard not to recognize when someone has done some great work to promote the discourse. Recently, someone from the Young Earth Creation Headquarters (YECHeadquarters.org) did some impressive work to their WikiPage, providing information not just on the YECHeadquarters.org website, but also added a lot of the thoughts, beliefs and discussion points of creationism. Of course, as a forum for discussion, AboutUs applauds this work and encourages more people to join in the conversation, either on the YECHeadquarters.org comments section or by building out the information on pages concerning evolution or other points of debate.



Retrieved from "http://aboutus.com/index.php?title=YECHeadquarters.org&oldid=36729315"